Nobody expects much of the Rolling Stones these days. They havent released anything approaching a decent album in nearly 25 years and their bloated tours are an embarrassment. So its tough to tell if A Bigger Bang is a genuinely respectable return to form or just a triumph of supremely low expectations. Punchy rockers like Rough Justice and Oh No, Not You Again, argue pretty persuasively for the former: Keith Richards dashes off sweaty riffs that hes seemingly had locked in a time capsule since the late '70s, while Mick recovers a good deal of his old swagger. Elsewhere, a subtle country twang lifts Let Me Down Slow, the gritty It Wont Take Long sports a nasty groove, and the potent Sweet Neo-Con finds Mick snarling invectives at the Bush Administration. All this is balanced with equal helpings of boring junkdull ballads, toothless rockers, and not one, but two, Keith Richards vocals. But so what if A Bigger Bang is a flawed album by a bunch of dudes trying to act half their ageat least theyre trying to act half their age again.