The Raiders lost to three of the best teams in the league. And had chances to win them all. Also, if a majority of their fans knew how to use a computer…I'm sure they'd be just as upset as I at your lack of faith!
—drwpuma

First off, I'm far more worried about Raiders fans clearing the literacy hurdle before finding the power button on the Wang computer they got from Radio Shack. Second off, are you really sure you're a real doctor, wpuma? Because the only Ph.D. you appear to have is in Dumbassery. The point you're attempting to make is that the Raiders, at 1–3, aren't as bad as their record might indicate because the games they lost came against "good" teams (New England, Kansas City, and Philadelphia). One minor flaw in your logic, Doctor Neinstein, is that if the Raiders don't beat "good" teams, then they themselves aren't a "good" team. Good teams win. Losers lose. It's that simple. So your beloved Silver and Black are mediocre at best and bad at worst. (The "good" money's on "bad".)

Since they can't beat good teams, here's how the Raiders season will play out:

WINS (Against "Bad" Teams)	LOSSES (Against "Good" Teams)
Buffalo	San Diego
Tennessee	Kansas City
Miami (I'm being generous here.)	Denver (Twice.)
NY Jets (Sadly, Vinny might be good by Week 14)	Washington
Cleveland	San Diego
	NY Giants

So you can see, the Raiders are looking at a 5–7 record for the rest of the season straight between the thighs. Couple that with the 1–3 start and you've got a not very "good" 6–10 record.